Path: news.gradwell.net!lon1-news.nildram.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!colt.net!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!harlech.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: Mark Goodge Newsgroups: uk.net.news.announce,uk.net.news.config,uk.culture.arts.writing Subject: RESULT: re-charter of uk.culture.arts.writing FAILS Followup-To: uk.net.news.config Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 12:47:47 +0100 Sender: Iain Bowen as Control Approved: Iain Bowen as Control Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: harlech.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: harlech.demon.co.uk:158.152.39.156 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1003060128 nnrp-02:6769 NO-IDENT harlech.demon.co.uk:158.152.39.156 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net Lines: 285 Xref: news.gradwell.net uk.net.news.announce:499 uk.net.news.config:22934 uk.culture.arts.writing:3260 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Result: re-charter of uk.culture.arts.writing FAILS as +12 requirement not met. Summary CFV: re-charter of uk.culture.arts.writing received 12 votes in favour and 3 against, with 5 abstentions. This fails to meet the requirement for a winning margin of 12 or greater. Therefore, the proposal fails. Voting closed at 23:59:59 BST, 9th October 2001 Proponent: Jack Howard <{J}@stormshadow.co.uk> Votetaker: Mark Goodge Distribution: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.culture.arts.writing ====================================================================== The full results follow below in the following order: 1) Information on the ballot 2) Results 3) Individual Vote Details 4) Votetakers Comments 5) Voting and Appeal Guidelines 6) Rationale and Proposal ====================================================================== INFORMATION ON THE BALLOT Voters were asked to vote separately on three questions: Section 1: Amend the charter of uk.culture.arts.writing as proposed? YES/NO Section 2: If the proposal is passed, which version of the copyright warning should be used? SHORT/LONG Section 3: If the proposal is passed, what should be the maximum number of lines permitted? A: 100 lines B: 200 lines C: 500 lines D: 750 lines E: unlimited Sections 1 and 2 were simple 2-option votes. Section 3 was a multi-option vote using the Condorcet voting system. ====================================================================== RESULTS There were 20 valid votes cast. Section 1 YES: 12 NO: 3 ABSTAIN: 5 Under the Voting Procedures for the uk.* Hierarchy, a winning option must have at least 12 YES votes more than NO votes. In this case, the winning margin did not reach this number and the proposal therefore fails. As the proposal to amend the charter fails, it was not necessary to evaluate the remaining options. The information is presented in the vote tables, below, purely for reference and to allow voters to verify their vote. ====================================================================== INDIVIDUAL VOTE DETAILS Notes: 1. In sections 1, voters were asked to chose between YES and NO. In section 2, voters were asked to choose between LONG and SHORT. These are represented in the vote column by 'Y', 'N', 'L' and 'S' respectively, with 'A' indicating an abstention. 2. In section 3, voters were asked to rank the options from 1 (highest) to 5 (lowest). Equal rankings are allowed, and any unranked options are considered to be ranked below all ranked options. 3. Voters used a variety of different marks (or lack of them) to indicate unranked options or abstentions. Irrespective of the actual character used, all unranked options have been represented in sections 1 and 2 by 'A' and in section 3 by '-' (dash). Section 1 2 3 Name Email | | A B C D E David Hadley ah004a2055?cableinet@co@ku N L 1 2 3 4 5 David Mahon dmahonvote-UCAW-RC?amigo@co@ku N L 1 2 3 4 5 Glenys Pople gkp?howfen@demon@co@ku Y L 5 4 3 2 1 Jon Thomson J@A@Thomson?warwick@ac@ku Y S 3 2 1 3 4 Jack Howard {J}?stormshadow@co@ku Y L - - 1 2 3 Monkey Doctor (aka MD) james?beresfordj@freeserve@co@ku Y L 5 4 3 2 1 James Coupe james?zephyr@org@ku A A 1 1 1 1 1 Jeffrey Goldberg jeffrey?goldmark@gro A S 2 1 3 4 5 Jezza jezza?hotwells@freeserve@co@ku Y L 2 1 3 4 5 Mark Tyndall mrt102?york@ac@ku Y S 3 2 1 2 3 Mark Wallace mwallace?noknok@ln Y L - - 1 - - MJR markj+vote?cloaked@freeserve@co@ku A L 3 2 1 4 5 Peter J Ross peter@j@ross?btinternet@moc Y S 5 4 3 2 1 Peter Smyth psmyth?gmx@ten Y S 2 1 3 4 5 Philip Powell philip?blencathra@org@ku A A - - - - - Rex M F Smith sumisu?gehena@demon@co@ku Y L 4 2 1 3 5 Rob Linham rob_linham?yahoo@co@ku A L 3 2 1 4 5 SANWIN sanwin?lineone@ten N L 1 2 3 4 5 Stuart Stanton-Davies Stuart?Stuartd@demon@co@ku Y S 5 4 3 2 1 thomas lee tfl?psp@co@ku Y S 1 2 3 4 5 Invalid votes: Nigel Ashton nigel?nigelashton@co@ku Ack bounced ====================================================================== VOTETAKER'S COMMENTS A very low turnout made counting this ballot a trivial exercise - it took longer to write up the results. Although sections 2 and 3 didn't need to be formally evaluated, I tallied them anyway purely for information. The long version of the copyright warning had a small majority, 11 to 7. Option C would have won the line length restriction. ====================================================================== This vote was conducted by a neutral third party member of UKVoting. UKVoting is a group of independent votetakers who count votes on behalf of the uk.* hierarchy and other 3rd parties. The rules under which votes for the uk.* hierarchy are taken are posted regularly to uk.net.news.announce or can be found at the following URL: The UKVoting web pages can be found at There is a five day discussion period after these results are posted to uk.net.news.announce. Allegations of irregularity should be sent to control@usenet.org.uk. ====================================================================== RATIONALE AND PROPOSAL FROM THE CFV Rationale for re-charter of uk.culture.arts.writing The original charter of this group prohibited the posting of works of writing. Experience has shown the group to be more useful and lively if the posting of work, for critique and discussion, is permitted, so this RFD seeks to "accommodate" such postings. As far as possible this charter has been derived from the current Mini-FAQ of UCAW, with amendments suggested by various readers of uk.net.news.config during a previous re-chartering attempt. Proposal: Change the charter of uk.culture.arts.writing to the following: Newsgroups line: uk.culture.arts.writing Discussion & critique of all forms of writing in the UK Charter uk.culture.arts.writing UCAW is aimed to be a UK-centred group where writers, and those interested in the subject of writing, can discuss work and opinions about writing in the English language. [i] Original writing Somewhere for writers (of all genres/forms), with a UK interest, to post their work and have it discussed and critiqued by others. Somewhere for readers to cast their eye over new writers work, with a UK connection, for interest. # Begin Alternative wording # Copyright warning: long version Note: Potential posters beware, once a work has been posted to Usenet, it is highly unlikely to be accepted for publication by any commercial organization. While technically you retain copyright, posting a work to Usenet is regarded in some quarters as releasing it to the Public Domain. UCAW is intended for those wishing to learn the craft of writing, rather than for final publication of completed works. A work posted on UCAW will in all likelihood be un-saleable anywhere else. # OR # Copyright warning: short Potential posters should be aware that once work has been posted to Usenet, commercial publishers may be unwilling to republish it. # End alternative wording [ii] Publishing For people to ask questions, offer insights and assistance with the practicalities of getting work published in the United Kingdom. [iii] Discussion Readers, academics, writers, and anyone else interested in the subject, can use UCAW to discuss the work of published authors, points on style and grammar, and anything else that roughly fits in. What is acceptable posting? [G] Generally As per pretty much anywhere on Usenet, personal abuse is unacceptable and so is spam. Post your own works, or constructively comment on other people's posts, and everyone gains. See also the note on "Formatting" below. [i] Original writing It's probably a good idea to prefix the header with [story], [essay], [poem], or other appropriate description just so people know what you're about. A word count in the subject line may also be helpful. Length: Postings should generally be restricted to a maximum length of \nnnnn\ lines of no more than 72 characters. Very long posts are unlikely to be read, and are also wasteful of news server disk space and transmission - remember, any article you post will be copied and stored on thousands of computer systems around the world. # The value of \nnnnn\ in the paragraph above is to be decided by vote. # If the vote is in favour of no maximum, the first # sentence will be deleted entirely. [ii] Publishing If you offer any opinions regarding publishing, it would help if you qualify comments with your experiences. It will add some weight to your observations. Again, this isn't a hard and fast rule, just a suggestion. Advertising Advertising is forbidden. Binaries & Formatting Encoded binaries (e.g. pictures, compressed files, etc.) are forbidden. Such material belongs on a web or FTP site to which a pointer may be posted. Cryptographic signatures (e.g. PGP) may be used where authentication is important and should be as short as possible. Posters are asked to refrain from using cryptographic signatures unnecessarily. Posts must be readable as plain text. HTML, RTF and similarly formatted messages are prohibited. To see how to make some common newsreaders comply with this, read . Warning Anyone posting contrary to this charter may be reported to their System Administrator and/or Service Provider. END CHARTER ================================================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.1i Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBO8l7Y2OfGXkh8vHZAQGj9gP9Gz7YLt7meDRspCTfG9GwB3M6UMGM/BXD LxH/CgNe25i6g6ynj1639T6lU6bUYSqqvTws0192MvJfc19u5UoMj+T+jih1kzoe E64EdmhjEd8UGcjF7j/o54judjuovNvhTcl8D0xEu7LsLEf9WMYShvjwTy2xfwUn QbOQMduPpyE= =4E3K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----